🧠 Localisation
📌 Definition Table
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Localization of Function | The theory that specific brain areas are responsible for specific psychological functions or behaviors. |
| Cortical Specialization | The distribution of different functions across distinct areas of the cerebral cortex. |
| Broca’s Area | Brain region in the left frontal lobe responsible for speech production. |
| Wernicke’s Area | Region in the left temporal lobe essential for speech comprehension. |
| Hippocampus | A structure in the limbic system associated with memory consolidation and spatial navigation. |
| Amygdala | Part of the limbic system involved in processing emotions, particularly fear and aggression. |
| Corpus Callosum | Bundle of neural fibers connecting the left and right hemispheres, enabling interhemispheric communication. |
📌Core Concepts
Definition:
Localization of function refers to the concept that different parts of the brain perform distinct roles in behavior and cognition. This principle emerged from 19th-century neurology, evolving through studies of brain injury, neuroimaging, and animal research.
While early theorists like Gall (phrenology) oversimplified this idea, modern neuroscience shows that although specific brain regions are specialized, most behaviors arise from the interaction between localized areas.
Localization forms the foundation of biological psychology, connecting mental processes like memory, language, and emotion to observable neural structures. Modern neuroimaging techniques (fMRI, PET) have refined our understanding, showing that while certain functions are concentrated, they remain integrated within brain networks.
Mechanisms and Functional Areas
| Brain Region | Function | Associated Behavior / Process |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal Lobe | Decision-making, impulse control, planning | Executive function, moral reasoning |
| Parietal Lobe | Sensory integration, spatial processing | Touch, spatial orientation |
| Temporal Lobe | Auditory processing, memory | Speech comprehension, facial recognition |
| Occipital Lobe | Visual processing | Visual recognition and perception |
| Hippocampus | Memory formation | Long-term memory, spatial navigation |
| Amygdala | Emotional processing | Fear, aggression |
| Broca’s Area | Speech production | Language expression |
| Wernicke’s Area | Speech comprehension | Language understanding |
| Corpus Callosum | Inter-hemispheric communication | Coordination between hemispheres |
📌Key Studies
- Broca (1861) – “Tan” Study
- Aim: Investigate speech loss in patient “Tan” who could only utter one syllable.
- Findings: Postmortem examination revealed a lesion in the left frontal lobe (now called Broca’s area).
- Conclusion: Speech production localized in the left frontal region.
2. Wernicke (1874)
- Aim: Examine patients with speech comprehension deficits but intact speech production.
- Findings: Lesions in the left posterior temporal lobe caused impaired understanding.
- Conclusion: Language comprehension localized in Wernicke’s area.
3. Maguire et al. (2000)
- Aim: Investigate whether London taxi drivers show structural brain differences related to spatial memory.
- Method: MRI scans compared taxi drivers to control participants.
- Findings: Taxi drivers had increased grey matter in the posterior hippocampus, correlated with years of navigation experience.
- Conclusion: The hippocampus is involved in spatial memory and demonstrates experience-dependent plasticity.
4. HM Case Study (Scoville & Milner, 1957)
Aim: Explore the effects of hippocampal removal on memory.
Findings: HM developed anterograde amnesia — inability to form new long-term memories.
Conclusion: The hippocampus is essential for memory consolidation.
🔍 Evaluation
Strengths:
- Neuroimaging (MRI/fMRI) provides empirical support through correlational evidence.
- Case studies offer detailed insights into specific brain-behavior relationships.
- Consistent replication across studies (Broca, Wernicke, Maguire) supports general reliability.
Limitations:
- Reductionist – oversimplifies behavior as arising from one area, ignoring network interaction.
- Individual variation – not all functions are identically localized across individuals.
- Case studies lack generalizability and sometimes rely on postmortem analysis.
Ethical Considerations:
- Brain-injury studies often use patients with limited consent capacity.
- Modern neuroimaging resolves many ethical issues through non-invasive techniques.
🔍Tok link
Localization relies on inference, not direct observation — we cannot see “memory” or “language,” only brain activation patterns.
This challenges how scientific knowledge is built: Does brain activation cause a behavior or merely correlate with it?
Knowledge Question: To what extent can we rely on indirect evidence (neuroimaging) to claim causation in psychology?
🌐 Real-World Connection
Understanding localization aids neurorehabilitation, education, and mental health treatment.
Neurosurgery planning uses localization to avoid damaging critical regions.
In stroke therapy, knowing which hemisphere controls speech or motor movement helps target recovery strategies.
❤️ CAS Link
Students could design a neuroscience outreach project—for example, creating informational posters or workshops explaining brain regions to younger students or communities. This encourages awareness of brain health, stroke, or trauma recovery, linking CAS service and creativity.
🧠 IA Guidance
IB Psychology Internal Assessments can replicate localization studies using memory recall or language tasks (e.g., Stroop test) to explore cognitive performance related to hemispheric processing. Students can relate cognitive outcomes to underlying brain functions..
🧠 Examiner Tips
In Paper 1 SAQs, structure your response using:
- Define localization.
- Describe the brain region and function.
- Support with one study (e.g., Maguire or HM).
- Briefly discuss strengths/limitations